co.brick sp. z o.o. is implementing the project titled "Intelligent Cloud Application Research Platform" and "Advanced Tool for Application Maintenance and Diagnostics for IT Start-ups"

    European Funds logo — project co-financed by the European UnionNational Centre for Research and Development (NCBR) logo — funding institution
    Software modernization

    Software modernization & technical debt remediation

    Audit first, then fix what actually costs you money. We quantify your technical debt, turn it into a prioritised roadmap and remediate legacy systems in 2-week sprints — without freezing your product roadmap.

    Book a technical auditCalculate your debt cost

    What is technical debt remediation?

    Technical debt remediation is the planned repayment of shortcuts in an existing codebase — quantifying what they cost in delivery speed, incidents and risk, then removing them in prioritised increments while the product keeps shipping.

    Join the leaders who have relied on stable technology:

    Customs4Trade logo — co.brick client
    Emporix logo — co.brick client
    FactFinder logo — co.brick client
    Kontrol logo — co.brick client
    Productsup logo — co.brick client
    Rubicon Bridge logo — co.brick client
    Entra Group logo — co.brick client
    Elowenta logo — co.brick client
    Fundacja Przemysłu Przyszłości logo — co.brick client
    Clutch logo — co.brick rated 4.7 out of 5 on Clutch ★ 4.7

    Signs your technical debt is now a business problem

    Debt stops being an engineering topic the moment it shows up in your roadmap, your incident log or your sales cycle.

    Releases keep slipping

    What used to ship in days now takes weeks. Every change touches code nobody wants to own.

    The same bugs return

    Regressions reappear because there are no tests, no observability and no clear module boundaries.

    Knowledge sits with one person

    Only one engineer understands the critical path — onboarding takes months and holidays are risky.

    Legacy blocks new products

    A monolith or unsupported runtime stops you from adding integrations, AI features or new markets.

    Cloud costs drift upward

    Oversized instances, duplicated data flows and manual operations quietly inflate the monthly bill.

    Audits and compliance stall

    Missing role separation, weak tenant isolation or unpatched dependencies block enterprise deals.

    ROI Calculator — Technical Debt

    Check how much a digital worker could save you

    Number of developers10
    % time on tech debt30%
    Avg developer cost (monthly)3,500 EUR
    30%tech debt

    Annual loss from tech debt

    126,000 EUR

    Monthly loss

    10,500 EUR

    Daily loss

    485 EUR

    Potential savings

    75,600 EUR

    with Cobrick (60% reduction)

    Manual processes cost more than you think. Find out how automation and digital workers will impact your budget over the next 12 months.

    By submitting the form you agree to our Privacy Policy.

    From audit to guardrails — the remediation process

    Every engagement follows the same four stages, with clear milestones so you always know what is being fixed, why, and what it changes.

    01

    Technical audit (1–2 weeks)

    We review architecture, code quality, dependencies, data model, security posture, CI/CD and delivery metrics. You get a written report with severity-ranked findings — not a sales deck.

    • Architecture and dependency map
    • Security and access-control review
    • Delivery metrics: lead time, change failure rate
    02

    Remediation roadmap

    Findings become a prioritised backlog with effort, business impact and sequencing, so you can decide what to fix now, what to fix later and what to accept.

    • Quick wins vs structural work
    • Cost of delay per item
    • Refactor / rewrite / replace decision per module
    03

    Remediation in 2-week sprints

    We work alongside your team — strangler-pattern extraction, test coverage on critical paths, dependency upgrades and integration cleanup — with a demo every sprint and no feature freeze.

    • Incremental, reversible changes
    • Tests added before refactoring
    • Release cadence kept intact
    04

    Guardrails so debt does not return

    We leave behind monitoring, alerting and quality gates in CI, plus documentation and knowledge transfer to your engineers.

    • Monitoring and alerting with Observe
    • Quality gates in the pipeline
    • Architecture decision records

    Refactor, extract or rewrite?

    The decision is made per module, not per system. This is the comparison we use during the roadmap stage.

    Comparison of software modernization approaches by effort and risk
    ApproachWhen it fitsEffortRisk
    Rehost / replatformThe application is stable, but the infrastructure is expensive or unsupported.LowLow
    Targeted refactorA few modules cause most incidents and slow down every release.MediumLow
    Strangler extractionA monolith must keep running while new services take over module by module.MediumMedium
    RewriteThe domain model no longer matches the business and the stack is a dead end.HighHigh

    Read the audit playbook

    A walkthrough of what we look for when we audit a codebase that looks production-ready — role separation, tenant isolation, dependency risk and the findings that block enterprise deals.

    Read the article

    Where modernization continues

    • Custom software development — rebuild the modules the audit marks as dead ends.
    • System integrations — connect legacy systems with cloud platforms and remove manual data transfer.
    • Managed teams — add engineering capacity for longer remediation programmes.
    • Observe — monitoring and alerting so new debt is spotted early.
    • Case studies — how these engagements played out for other clients.

    Technical debt remediation — FAQ

    Take technology off your list of worries. Let’s talk specifics.

    15 minutes that could save months of work and hundreds of thousands of euros.

    Book a 30-minute consultation